Banks are in trouble right now, yeah? They really need all the cash they can get to stay afloat, right?
Apparently not. Because when I checked about renewing the CD I have my liquid nest egg in, the *best* rate they can offer me is around 2%, and that's for a 12-month deposit. The rate they're offering for something like I have now is around 1.7%. The CD I currently have is over 3%, and that was relatively short term.
This tells me that they don't really *want* my cash, because they're not willing to offer me anything much to borrow it. I need to finally take the time to sit down with my retirement account manager, but I'm tempted to follow the president's advice and put my money into actual investments. Yes, the market is probably going to go down some more before it goes up, but it *will* go back up. And 2% is derisory!
Apparently not. Because when I checked about renewing the CD I have my liquid nest egg in, the *best* rate they can offer me is around 2%, and that's for a 12-month deposit. The rate they're offering for something like I have now is around 1.7%. The CD I currently have is over 3%, and that was relatively short term.
This tells me that they don't really *want* my cash, because they're not willing to offer me anything much to borrow it. I need to finally take the time to sit down with my retirement account manager, but I'm tempted to follow the president's advice and put my money into actual investments. Yes, the market is probably going to go down some more before it goes up, but it *will* go back up. And 2% is derisory!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 06:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 08:59 pm (UTC)You are getting just safety. Some banks are having teaser rates (as soshesays said below).
If you think of it, a 1.7% return is dismal, but not compared to the losses people are taking on the stock market right now (I don't even look at our retirement account...)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 09:22 pm (UTC)Likewise, they need income. So they should not be giving people unusually good deals on loans. Decent, so as to get them to borrow, but not great. Instead, according to the real estate agents I've talked to, they are being conservative about who they loan to (finally--wish they'd done that a while back) but giving them really good deals on loans if they qualify. Mortgages at or around 4% are not unknown.
This is all about the farthest from what banks ought to be doing as possible. But, you know, they've been shown in the past six months that it really doesn't matter what they do--they can screw up as much as they want and the Federal Government will cover them.
I'd really like to see some bank FAILURES. The FDIC would still insure all of our holdings in the banks (up to $250K--any of us here have more than that in the bank?), but the people running them would be OUT OF A JOB. No more multimillion dollar salaries and bonuses. No more big parties and conferences. There would be new banks, which would need to employ all the people who actually do the *work* in banks. But the CEOs and upper management would be out on the street, Where, IMO, they belong.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 09:04 pm (UTC)And I have *good* credit. Thank god there's nothing big just sitting on that card right now.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 11:03 pm (UTC)All I will say is that due to the low borrowing rate the banks are not receiving as much interest in to allow them to pay a higher interest rate out. (appreciate it is a very simplistic answer - but as I said before didn't want to bore you!