winterbadger: (rt rev & lrnd father in god wm laud)
[personal profile] winterbadger
I think it's terrifically important to save, preserve, and protect historic buildings, including church buildings.

But to bankrupt someone wholly unconnected with the church in the name of doing so is atrocious and outwith any Christian principle I was brought up to recognise.

Summary: A couple who live in Wales but inherited farm in Warwickshire are being required to pay nearly £200,000 for upkeep of a church near the farm because one of the fields of the farm was designated at some point in the distant past as property that should support the church.

Even one of the Law Lords who decided the case called the relevant law "anachronistic, even capricious".

Apparently homebuyers can now purchase insurance to protect one against later discovery of such a liability.

Sheesh.

Date: 2007-02-19 04:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] candlelight1228.livejournal.com
That's ridiculous. But then again the Church of England seems to be living up to the same standard King Henry VIII set. After all, he had taken all the money from the churches. Not saying it's right just saying they are living by the same standard that was set for them. Any wonder why Eddie Izzard pokes fun at them.

I wish there was something to be done for the couple.

Date: 2007-02-19 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] plutosonium.livejournal.com
Forfeit the property to the bank, maybe? Sue? Deed the field over and let the church find some way to make money off of it?

Profile

winterbadger: (Default)
winterbadger

March 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
34567 89
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 14th, 2026 03:37 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios