(no subject)
Aug. 14th, 2006 03:20 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
winterbadgerThanks to ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
snolan for this link.
Yes, the recent terror arrests were timed for US political purposes, in direct contradiction to what our British allies believed were the tactical and legal best practices of the operation.
Ned Lamont is not a tool of the terrorists, Mr Vice President. You and your party are: you are doing just what the terrorists want you to do: destroying democracy for your personal and political gain.
Anyone remember how the conservative Republicans, including members of our own administration, had identified the Taliban and the Saudi conservatives as potential allies in the UN to help fight against the expansion of women's rights and the spread of progressive thinking on family planning? It seems very ironic that the people who are insisting that they are the only leaders capable of defeating our current enemies are those who until the war began were closest to them.
snolan for this link.Yes, the recent terror arrests were timed for US political purposes, in direct contradiction to what our British allies believed were the tactical and legal best practices of the operation.
Ned Lamont is not a tool of the terrorists, Mr Vice President. You and your party are: you are doing just what the terrorists want you to do: destroying democracy for your personal and political gain.
Anyone remember how the conservative Republicans, including members of our own administration, had identified the Taliban and the Saudi conservatives as potential allies in the UN to help fight against the expansion of women's rights and the spread of progressive thinking on family planning? It seems very ironic that the people who are insisting that they are the only leaders capable of defeating our current enemies are those who until the war began were closest to them.
