(no subject)
Feb. 26th, 2008 12:01 pmMy friend JRC pointed out to me this rather astounding statement from Geraldine Ferraro (not surprisingly, given the tenor of the remark, a Clinton supporter)
"Besides, the delegate totals from primaries and caucuses do not necessarily reflect the will of rank-and-file Democrats. Most Democrats have not been heard from at the polls. We have all been impressed by the turnout for this year’s primaries — clearly both candidates have excited and engaged the party’s membership — but, even so, turnout for primaries and caucuses is notoriously low. It would be shocking if 30 percent of registered Democrats have participated.
If that is the case, we could end up with a nominee who has been actively supported by, at most, 15 percent of registered Democrats. That’s hardly a grassroots mandate."
Another sad, pathetic attempt by a Clinton supporter to rubbish the Democratic Party's own process in order to see their own candidate nominated.
I wasn't really expecting to find even more ways that I could be disgusted with US politicians, but it seems that there is always room for more.
"Besides, the delegate totals from primaries and caucuses do not necessarily reflect the will of rank-and-file Democrats. Most Democrats have not been heard from at the polls. We have all been impressed by the turnout for this year’s primaries — clearly both candidates have excited and engaged the party’s membership — but, even so, turnout for primaries and caucuses is notoriously low. It would be shocking if 30 percent of registered Democrats have participated.
If that is the case, we could end up with a nominee who has been actively supported by, at most, 15 percent of registered Democrats. That’s hardly a grassroots mandate."
Another sad, pathetic attempt by a Clinton supporter to rubbish the Democratic Party's own process in order to see their own candidate nominated.
I wasn't really expecting to find even more ways that I could be disgusted with US politicians, but it seems that there is always room for more.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 05:16 am (UTC)Dude, get laid now and then. Let go of high school. It's okay that you joined the Girl Scouts of the military. I'm a girl and I still joined the Army and saw combat. Fuck is your excuse? A pathetically small dick?
no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 12:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 12:40 pm (UTC)Clearly people care.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-27 12:50 pm (UTC)Through 10 years of Air Force propaganda (most of it Army, btw), I always knew I was reading/seeing/hearing only one side of the story, and my critical thinking skills (given to me by excellent parents) enabled me to call BS on most of the junk they were trying to sell us as facts. I know what a screw up Reagan was, and was one of several troops disciplined in 1986 for turning backs on him rather than saluting when he visited my base (we were particularly incensed that he was sheltering Ferdinand Markos at tax-payer expense).
Yes, I hate Reagan. His administration represents a great deal of the self-loathing that educated Americans must deal with today.
And I repeat my comparison with H.R. Clinton and Reagan, with a straight and disgusted face, further more I stand by it. While I disagree with our host winterbadger on comparing her to Bush (IMHO she's clearly better than Bush, but that's not saying much). I totally think she is much alike with Bush the senior and Reagan. She is pro-corporate profits, pro-rich, and not good for labor.