Between these reviews and it being written (in part) by Neil Gaiman, I might actually change my mind and give this a try.
http://www.strangehorizons.com/reviews/2007/11/beowulf-comments.shtml
http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/henrygee/2007/11/19/bigging-up-beowulf
http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/reviews/2007/beowulf.html
http://www.catholicnews.com/data/movies/07mv233.htm
http://www.strangehorizons.com/reviews/2007/11/beowulf-comments.shtml
http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/henrygee/2007/11/19/bigging-up-beowulf
http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/reviews/2007/beowulf.html
http://www.catholicnews.com/data/movies/07mv233.htm
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 10:35 pm (UTC)You've probably read my opinions of it on my own blog, so I won't reiterate -- and don't get me wrong, I definitely think you should see it if you're so inclined -- but I feel like I should warn you of one thing.
I'm a big fan of Neil Gaiman, but he reeeeeeeally disappointed me on this one. I thought that the script was the weakest part of the thing -- some of the lines just made me want to crawl under the icky popcorn-and-soda-sticky chair cringing.
It's interesting; it's an interesting idea, and it's thought-provoking. But did I like it? Meh.
But yes. Do see it! Then we can get your side of it, too! :)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-29 01:42 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beowulf
And for either the period it was set, the period it was finally written down, or any point in between, mail would have been rivetted. At least the film doesn't have it knitted, but this isn't much better.