WTF?

Oct. 16th, 2007 07:51 am
winterbadger: (pooh tao)
[personal profile] winterbadger
Beijing has strongly urged US President George W Bush to cancel a planned meeting with the Dalai Lama, saying it would "seriously damage" relations.

Mr Bush is due to host Tibet's spiritual leader at the White House.

On Wednesday, Mr Bush is due to attend a ceremony at the US Capitol where the Dalai Lama will receive a Congressional Gold Medal, a top US civilian award.

It will be the first time a sitting president will have appeared in public with the 72-year-old Buddhist leader.


I'm horrified by that last piece of information, but pleased that--if he does nothing else of value in his term as president--George Bush will have repaired that mistake.

I completely fail to understand how this country can continue to have normal relations with China, given that they invaded and seized another country and are attempting to ethnically cleanse it (and parts of China with non-Chinese populations) by suppressing their language and culture and religion and importing settlers. These are things that the US did in the 18th and 19th centuries to Native Americans and is deeply ashamed of now; how can we stand by and tolerate it in China?

Well, apparently we're OK with it in Israel, so I guess China is just a matter of scale... :-(

Date: 2007-10-16 12:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peaceful-fox.livejournal.com
I am so boggled by this. I can't think of a person as benign as the Dalai Lama.

Date: 2007-10-16 09:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keethrax.livejournal.com
I can think of lots. At least if you consider the rest of the government he represents. The Dalai Lama himself may qualify, but he represents a very oppressive regime that was thrown out by the Chinese. Sure, they were even worse, but that doesn't make the old Tibetan gov't good. Just less bad.

Were they better than the Chinese occupation? Sure. But hardly benign. By my reading, despite the post-occupation claims of the Tibetan gov't that they would have modernized, they were *always* steadfastly opposed to any form of modernization or social reform that would give the serfdom that made up a large chunk (the gov't in exile claims the # is much smaller than the Chinese claim, but US documents from pre-occupation put the # at much closer to the PRC claims than to the Tibetan gov't in exile's claims) of the population any significant improvements in rights.

They're really only "good guys" by relative comparison to the occupiers, who by any measurement are certainly "bad guys".

Date: 2007-10-17 06:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keethrax.livejournal.com
I agree with everything you said.

I was only commenting on the:

"I can't think of a person as benign as the Dalai Lama."

In no way does saying that I disagree that the Dalai Lama (or at least the gov't represented by said person) is benign mean that I do agree with anything the Chinese have done.

Date: 2007-10-17 05:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] schizokitty.livejournal.com
Well, apparently we're OK with it in Israel, so I guess China is just a matter of scale...

Completely a matter of scale. For one thing, we're too dependent on our trade relations with them to want to raise too much of a stink. For another, China is not only belligerent and irrational, it is fucking huge. I bet even Cheney soils himself when he thinks of seriously pissing off China. >:-O

Profile

winterbadger: (Default)
winterbadger

March 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
34567 89
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 17th, 2025 01:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios