This one especially is exactly what *should* be happening, in my view. Calling one to account for the ideas one promlgates as fact is and shoudl eb part of the process.
Good find!
The other artcile seems to have only two points, one of which is not too significant, in my view, in the first place and which, anyway, suggests that Card's comments soon after were misleading *as is* Moore's apparent attempt to portray the Pres. as "shaken," according to the artcile. The other point the second link makes is better described in the first, re: the Carlyle Group.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2004-07-01 05:47 pm (UTC)This one especially is exactly what *should* be happening, in my view. Calling one to account for the ideas one promlgates as fact is and shoudl eb part of the process.
Good find!
The other artcile seems to have only two points, one of which is not too significant, in my view, in the first place and which, anyway, suggests that Card's comments soon after were misleading *as is* Moore's apparent attempt to portray the Pres. as "shaken," according to the artcile. The other point the second link makes is better described in the first, re: the Carlyle Group.