winterbadger: (centurion)
[personal profile] winterbadger
first criminal trial without a jury in 350 years ends

Is it just me, or is this disturbing?

Even more, I'm engaged in an argument with some of my UK editing colleagues about whether the elimination of jury trials altogether is desirable. "It's such a bother being a juror! Jury trials are so expensive! Everyone gets excused anyway, so why bother?"

Yes, jury trials are more expensive than trials without juries. For the matter of that, having trials is much more expensive than just having the police arrest someone and having a magistrate sentence them--why bother with trials?

Does everyone really get excused service? Is the solution to do away with juries, then? Or perhaps it might be to tighten up on the rules for excuses? In my county, the court will accept almost no excuse for failure to serve; even those with legitimate reasons they can't serve on a given date are expected to serve on a different date. But service is not a hardship; almost no trials go for more that 2-3 days.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

winterbadger: (Default)
winterbadger

March 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
34567 89
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 05:04 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios