[identity profile] peaceful-fox.livejournal.com 2006-06-29 05:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Yow! :-(

[identity profile] motherwell.livejournal.com 2006-06-29 06:28 pm (UTC)(link)
At least she's satisfied with her current society and her current place in it. That makes her less likely to vote for some dangerous radical fruit-bat. A baby-step in the right direction is still a step in the right direction.

[identity profile] pisica.livejournal.com 2006-06-29 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't be *too* upset about it. Back in the 1890s, some women argued that they shouldn't have the vote because their position in society was different than that of men, so men should be the ones to vote. It's sad that some women don't want to be empowered, but that didn't stop universal suffrage becoming acceptable, and it won't stop anything here.

[identity profile] gr-c17.livejournal.com 2006-06-30 02:14 pm (UTC)(link)
In the 1980's pollsters were finding woman who freely admitted to voting the way their husbands or fathers told them, some even had it written down. Not every one cares to participate, and it's not our place to slap them around about it.

[identity profile] gr-c17.livejournal.com 2006-06-30 04:50 pm (UTC)(link)
(a) Perhaps the phrase "lead a horse to water..." would have been more correct. I certainly did not mean to imply you were guilty of assault.

Actually I agree with the base points of b&c. My point was to illustrate that even in our country there are people who will not step to the poll and think for themselves. It's interesting to note she is "...keen to take part in the whole process. But I would rather not have to." She seems to be saying she is being forced to vote. Her first quote leads to the same place, "I am not happy about HAVING to vote".

As to being "entitled to our opinions" she is entitled to hers. In the same vein I hope you've known me long enough to know I value your opinion over most peoples facts.*


( Now I'm mad. You made be paraphrase Star Trek )