winterbadger: (pants)
winterbadger ([personal profile] winterbadger) wrote2010-03-30 11:38 am
Entry tags:

bloody hell

This situation truly warrants the "pants" icon.

I had calculated to a nicety how far negative I could go in leave to take my trip next week.

As you can imagine, that didn't involve me taking nearly a week off sick (I can't recall the last time I did this that wasn't recovery from an operation).

So, I have the choice of taking my vacation as planned but taking the time off without pay (which would cost me a very large sum, let's call it X) or cancelling my trip (which would cost me, with nonrecoverable plane fare &c., about 2/3 of X).

This will be at least the third time in the past four years that I've had to cancel an overseas trip at the last minute. Of course, the last time I *took* an overseas trip it wasn't a 100% happy experience either.

*sigh*

[identity profile] schizokitty.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Sick days and vacation days come out of the same pool? Stingy bastards.

My gut reaction would be to go with option 1. If cancelling the trip was a smaller portion of X, then I'd say that, but a whopping 2/3? If you went, sure, you'd lose x/3, but you'd get something in return -- a wonderful vacation in a land you love. Take option two and all you've got is x/3.

Of course, you know better if you can afford x/3, so I expect my prattling is only complicating things. :-(

[identity profile] schizokitty.livejournal.com 2010-03-31 05:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually, I did not miss that fact. I was working on the assumption that going on the trip would make the 2/3X, although spent, not "wasted," and when I said "if you can afford x/3," I meant the additional x/3.

I'm sorry you can't afford it -- that sucks industrial sewage. >:-(