winterbadger: (great seal of the united states)
winterbadger ([personal profile] winterbadger) wrote2006-02-14 01:41 pm
Entry tags:

"We're not going to have 500 years"

Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] selki for pointing out this article. There are some thigns I don't like about this guy, but I think he's about 99% correct in the observations he makes.

[identity profile] arosoff.livejournal.com 2006-02-15 05:22 pm (UTC)(link)
no, it doesn't justify all of Israel's actions, but it makes the Arab nations' complaints and actions deeply hypocritical at best.

The articles argued that Israel is fundamentally based on apartheid, which is false. The fence and a few petty laws passed recently (for example on immigration of Palestinian spouses) make it seem like a reasonable comparison, but the reality is much more complex. Again, within Israel proper, legal equality has gradually developed over the years. Education is a problem but arose from a reasonable basis--Arabs wanted schools that taught in Arabic. They can send their kids to Jewish schools (which teach in Hebrew, and have Bible classes--there are separate religious schools) and some do. Arab schools receive equal funding from the national government, but Arab municipalities are poor (and often very corrupt--a few are notorious for it) so don't have money to top it up. And the parents are poor too, so don't have money for the "extras" that schools offer and which parents have to pay for. SO overall, there's less money, and fewer kids getting their bagrut (matriculation certificate required for university).

The restrictions only apply to Palestinian Arabs--and unlike South Africa, Israel doesn't lay legal claim to the West Bank and Gaza. It does lay claim to East Jerusalem and offered the Arabs there citizenship, which they declined (leading to the various complexities of the recent election). (They do hold permanent resident cards, and unlike Arabs in the West Bank, have full access to things like the health funds, National Insurance, etc.)

Furthermore, there are legitimate security considerations involved, even though the actions are not always proportionate.

It's kind of funny, within the Jewish context I'm fairly liberal and within the religious-Zionist context I'm nothing short of a kofer (heretic) - I'm anti-settler and I believe in the two state solution. (We can't rule them, we can't kick them out and a binational state is ludicrous. Hello, Lebanon anyone?) But the constant grinding down of Israel in the liberal press gets me down. Israel is the fount of all evil, the Palestinians are poor and oppressed...

And I'll admit it, Jews like me who grew up in the Zionist context just don't understand the Palestinians. We grew up with blue boxes and Hadassah and the image of the chalutzim. Our self-image was of building the country. If we weren't there, we were raising money for hospitals, for schools, for planting trees. We were voting for the World Zionist Congress. And we just don't understand why the Palestinians don't and didn't do the same.